This is a place for reasoned and intelligent discussion of conservative principles and current events.

A Supreme Court Ruling

A ‘Warrantless’ Search Is Not the Same as an ‘Unreasonable’ Search
A recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies an important distinction in Fourth Amendment cases.

PJ Media: March 6, 2014

If you were to learn that the Supreme Court had handed down a decision, and all you were told about it was that the opinion had been written by Justice Alito, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Breyer joining, and that Justice Ginsburg had filed a dissenting opinion, in which she was joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, do you think you’d be inclined to approve or disapprove of the outcome? And if you were to further learn that the decision had so rankled the editors at the most liberal newspaper west of the Hudson River, the Los Angeles Times, that they took to their pages to condemn it, would your inclination be altered?

Last November I wrote here on the case of Fernandez v. California, in which oral arguments had just been heard before the Supreme Court. I’m pleased to report that last week the Court, no doubt influenced by my column, ruled against Fernandez, an especially loathsome individual, upholding his conviction and the warrantless search of his apartment based on the consent of his live-in girlfriend. This is not to say the vitality of one’s constitutional rights should be in inverse proportion to one’s loathsomeness, but it’s gratifying that this petitioner, a street thug and an abuser of women, came away from the Court unsatisfied.

Read more.

Similar posts
  • The Difference between a Democracy and a Republic It does make a difference after all. It is the difference between a mob and the rights of every individual. It is the reason America is different and exceptional. It is a difference that has become obscured. It is a difference worth preserving. Admin What Does ‘We the People’ Really Mean? A Constitutional Scholar Explains [...]
  • If the Shoe Fits ” So here you are, wailing about what hell a Trump presidency will reign down on liberty, when you yourselves are the very arbiters such bondage. You voted for it. You continue to vote for it. You elect people who openly intend to limit the decision-making of the average citizen in favor of more government [...]
  • It’s a Democracy, Right? Now, there’s no evidence whatsoever that The Donald has ever read the Constitution or the founding principles of this country, let alone understands them, but the appeal of his argument to people like Bolling is a testament to the utter failure of the educational system to teach basic civics and history. No, Mr. Trump, We [...]
  • The government thinks you’re too stupid to think for yourself. Government in the United States was formed to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty.” But those in charge of the government today haven’t read the Constitution and don’t understand or don’t care about the purpose of government. They are elitists who [...]
  • One More Reason Conservatives Part Company With Trump The one subject you have hardly ever heard discussed by Trump is the defense of the Constitution and the principles of the Declaration of Independence. He loves the Constitution with the same sincerity he loves the public as long as he is winning. For conservatives the defense of the Constitution and the principles it espouses [...]

1 Comment

  1. Jim Lee Jim Lee
    March 7, 2014    

    I believe this is a proper ruling by the court. This was NOT an unreasonable search in my opinion and apparently SCOTUS either.

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: