This is a place for reasoned and intelligent discussion of conservative principles and current events.

A Supreme Court Ruling

A ‘Warrantless’ Search Is Not the Same as an ‘Unreasonable’ Search
A recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies an important distinction in Fourth Amendment cases.

PJ Media: March 6, 2014

If you were to learn that the Supreme Court had handed down a decision, and all you were told about it was that the opinion had been written by Justice Alito, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Breyer joining, and that Justice Ginsburg had filed a dissenting opinion, in which she was joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, do you think you’d be inclined to approve or disapprove of the outcome? And if you were to further learn that the decision had so rankled the editors at the most liberal newspaper west of the Hudson River, the Los Angeles Times, that they took to their pages to condemn it, would your inclination be altered?

Last November I wrote here on the case of Fernandez v. California, in which oral arguments had just been heard before the Supreme Court. I’m pleased to report that last week the Court, no doubt influenced by my column, ruled against Fernandez, an especially loathsome individual, upholding his conviction and the warrantless search of his apartment based on the consent of his live-in girlfriend. This is not to say the vitality of one’s constitutional rights should be in inverse proportion to one’s loathsomeness, but it’s gratifying that this petitioner, a street thug and an abuser of women, came away from the Court unsatisfied.

Read more.

Similar posts
  • In Boston: Government Prohibits Free ... The purpose of government is to protect our God given rights. That is clearly delineated in the Declaration of independence and codified by the Constitution. But through dereliction and inattention; not so much any more. In Boston of all places – Increasingly government institutions are imposing their vision of liberty and using whatever force is [...]
  • Looking for Adults to Check Your Stud... The irony of students (whose parents are paying tens of thousands of dollars each year for them to attend a university) feeling injured or threatened by the exposure to ideas that might differ from their prejudices is lost upon them. The fact that authorities respond to the absurdity of safe spaces, white privilege, speech codes, [...]
  • Why the Article V ‘SolutionR... ” State lawmakers – including several in South Carolina – love to talk about federal overreach. It’s easy to shake their fists at DC, but those fists turn to open palms when the money is doled out – and that’s where they actually give up the control they accuse Congress of taking. Do you really [...]
  • Mob Rule in America – Free Spee... The left’s strategy of intimidation through mob action has migrated to American universities where the principle of free speech has been redefined. The right to speak one’s opinion has been overruled by the right of a few students to hear only that which pleases them and their inherent right to threaten physical harm to those [...]
  • How Churchill Felt One can imagine how Winston Churchill felt when his observations on the threat of Adolph Hitler, Nazi Germany, and the threat of war were met with derision by the British public. Warnings of the threat posed by radical Islam are being met not only with derision but with charges of discrimination and islamaphopia. As we [...]

1 Comment

  1. Jim Lee Jim Lee
    March 7, 2014    

    I believe this is a proper ruling by the court. This was NOT an unreasonable search in my opinion and apparently SCOTUS either.

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.